{"id":846,"date":"2011-01-23T23:27:57","date_gmt":"2011-01-24T03:27:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/?p=846"},"modified":"2011-01-24T08:28:04","modified_gmt":"2011-01-24T12:28:04","slug":"watson-come-here-i-need-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/?p=846","title":{"rendered":"Watson, come here, I need you"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Having watched a mind-numbing amount of football today I&#8217;ve been subjected countless times to the idiotic commercials produced by IBM about having their Watson computer compete on Jeopardy.<\/p>\n<p>In one they wax rapturously about Watson being able to decipher the Groucho Marx quip about an elephant sleeping in his pajamas.  That is of course a classic example of an unclear antecedent.  Puzzling out an unclear antecedent is a worthy challenge.  But the Jeopardy question is, &#8220;&#8216;Groucho quipped, one morning I shot&#8217; this &#8216;in my pajamas.&#8221;  That&#8217;s not a difficult question to answer, it has nothing to do with understanding language or unclear antecedents.  It&#8217;s a simple lookup of Groucho Marx quotes for which any halfway bright computer science student could write a program that could be run on the brain dead Windows<sup>[1]<\/sup> <sup>[2]<\/sup> box you&#8217;re reading this post on.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not the worst of it.  On another commercial when the announcer (&#8220;I&#8217;m an I.B.M&#8217;er&#8221;, perhaps the most unsavory corporate branding since the iPad.  Please, don&#8217;t make me explain either one.) pronounces with gravity, &#8220;&#8230;hopefully, when people see Watson compete on Jeopardy&#8230;&#8221; it only makes me think, &#8220;I hope Watson can explain to you the correct use of &#8216;hopefully&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><sup>[1]<\/sup>Are you reading this on an Apple box? Sorry, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply the only OS in the world was Microsoft.  Please accept my apologies and go back to reading about how Steve Jobs is a creative genius.<\/p>\n<p><sup>[2]<\/sup>Are you reading this on a Linux box?  Why?  You&#8217;re way too smart to be reading this tripe.  Go back to writing man pages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Having watched a mind-numbing amount of football today I&#8217;ve been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-curmudgeon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chuckzumbrun.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}